H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jerzy Janowicz vs Peter Polansky H2H: 0-1
Peter Polansky holds a 1–0 lead over Jerzy Janowicz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Polansky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Polansky won the 2014 Canada Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Peter Polansky | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jerzy Janowicz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerzy Janowicz | #735 | #14 | 2,154 | 1,962 | 80 | 84 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerzy Janowicz | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #26 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #21 | 1,913 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |