H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Jesper de Jong holds a 1–0 lead over Federico Cina in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jesper de Jong leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jesper de Jong won the 2026 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesper de Jong | 6-3 6-1 6-3 | Federico Cina | Match data | May 27, 2026 | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesper de Jong | #100 | #71 | 821 | 1,767 | 24 | 34 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Cina | #181 | #174 | 335 | 1,626 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jesper de Jong | Federico Cina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #181 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #112 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jesper de Jong | Federico Cina | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1520 | 113.8 | -0.35 | -2.55 | 0.800 | 46.7% | +12 | +30 | — | 42.9% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.23 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1615 | 114.6 | -2.56 | -1.77 | 0.823 | 46.6% | — | +11 | — | 25.0% | -1.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.04 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1495 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1481 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 1525 | 108.3 | +0.21 | -2.99 | 0.723 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1544 | 113.3 | -0.09 | -0.77 | 0.702 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 1665 | 127.5 | -0.02 | +0.54 | 0.744 | 46.1% | -64 | +31 | — | 31.8% | -0.95 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 1733 | 133.9 | +0.95 | +0.45 | 1.023 | 50.3% | -52 | +63 | -154 | 53.2% | +0.10 | 5–4 (56%) | 12–8 (60%) | — | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 1688 | 124.8 | -2.15 | -0.83 | 0.863 | 47.6% | -73 | +80 | — | 35.7% | -0.52 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1768 | 129.4 | -0.23 | -0.10 | 0.913 | 48.6% | -62 | +66 | -154 | 42.2% | -0.36 | 9–7 (56%) | 14–17 (45%) | 102.2 | -3.48 | — | 1627 | 114.3 | -1.61 | -2.10 | 0.813 | 46.6% | +12 | +17 | — | 31.6% | -1.42 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.2 | +1.93 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Francesco Passaro | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Karen Khachanov | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Michelsen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Facundo Diaz Acosta | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Quentin Halys | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Jesper de Jong | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Reilly Opelka | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 24, 2026 | H2H |