H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jesse Levine vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 2-0
Jesse Levine holds a 2–0 lead over Danai Udomchoke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jesse Levine leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jesse Levine won the 2009 Indianapolis third round 6-1 7-6(10).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jesse Levine | 6-1 7-6(10) | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2008* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Jesse Levine | 4-6 6-1 6-0 | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse Levine | #691 | #69 | 720 | 1,807 | 31 | 64 | 32.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jesse Levine | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #135 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #115 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #289 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #104 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #149 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |