H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Jesse Levine vs Steve Darcis H2H: 2-0
Jesse Levine holds a 2–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jesse Levine leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jesse Levine won the 2008 New Haven fourth round 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2008* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jesse Levine | 2-0 (ret.) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2008* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jesse Levine | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse Levine | #691 | #69 | 720 | 1,807 | 31 | 64 | 32.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jesse Levine | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #135 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #115 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #289 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #104 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #149 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |