H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-2
Jim Courier and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1994 Miami Masters third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 7-5 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1991 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-2 7-5 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
| May 18, 1991* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Cherkasov | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1990* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |