H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-2

Jim Courier and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1994 Miami Open round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #5 6-3 7-5 Andrei Cherkasov #42 Match data Mar 10, 1994* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jim Courier #5 6-2 7-5 Andrei Cherkasov #14 Match data Aug 17, 1991* QF Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Andrei Cherkasov #18 4-6 6-1 6-2 Jim Courier #9 Match data May 18, 1991* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Andrei Cherkasov #31 3-6 6-2 6-3 Jim Courier #18 Match data Sep 28, 1990* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.78
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.83
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) — -1.80
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) — -2.86
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.60
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.62
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.66
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.31
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.