H2H data updated: 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-1

Jim Courier and Andrei Olhovskiy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1996 Roland Garros round of 128 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.

USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #8 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Andrei Olhovskiy #111 Match data May 29, 1996* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andrei Olhovskiy #193 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jim Courier #1 Match data Jun 28, 1992* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Andrei Olhovskiy #1,310 #49 690 1,731 116 163 41.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Olhovskiy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 — — — — — — —
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1987 0–2 0.0% #232 1,470 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1988 6–8 42.9% #86 1,519 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1989 4–10 28.6% #302 1,509 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1990 4–4 50.0% #148 1,567 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1991 4–10 28.6% #136 1,513 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1992 16–18 47.1% #80 1,639 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1993 26–29 47.3% #65 1,662 0 1
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1994 23–27 46.0% #97 1,671 0 1
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1995 12–21 36.4% #118 1,586 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 21–19 52.5% #90 1,695 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–14 0.0% #442 1,492 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,481 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1991 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 5 7 12 41.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 5 18 72.2%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 30 61 91 33.0% 16 36 52 30.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 47 43 90 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 209/241 of Andrei Olhovskiy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1991 11/14 4.6 4.6 54.5% 68.7% 43.3% 45.8% 38.1% 57.2% 34.9%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1992 34/34 5.6 4.1 54.4% 74.1% 50.1% 54.5% 38.5% 63.1% 37.8%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1993 45/55 6.8 3.3 57.9% 74.4% 48.4% 56.1% 34.0% 63.4% 37.0%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1994 46/50 9.6 5.1 55.7% 75.3% 48.5% 53.6% 44.2% 63.5% 35.8%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 1995 30/33 8.2 3.7 56.8% 73.7% 48.4% 57.7% 29.0% 62.8% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 30/40 8.3 4.8 56.3% 75.4% 47.6% 63.7% 38.3% 63.3% 34.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 12/14 10.7 5.5 52.7% 70.8% 45.8% 60.2% 31.0% 59.0% 32.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.8% 62.5% 57.9% 0.0% 100.0% 61.0% 34.2%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 209/279 7.7 4.3 56.0% 74.0% 48.2% 56.0% 37.2% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.8 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +18 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1987 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.07
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1988 1519 108.6 — — — — -34 — +107 45.7% -0.66 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +1.54
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1989 1509 111.6 — — — — -2 -18 — 33.3% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.3 +0.23
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1990 1568 127.2 — — — — +6 — — 55.0% +0.45 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.41
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1991 1513 111.9 -2.55 -1.87 0.815 46.2% -30 — +200 32.5% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 +0.66
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1992 1639 134.2 +1.24 +0.43 1.025 50.2% -51 -113 +131 49.4% -0.09 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) 104.4 -0.10
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1993 1662 134.3 +1.97 -1.09 1.010 49.5% +17 -124 +94 48.1% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 12–11 (52%) 103.3 -0.58
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 1994 1672 128.7 +1.65 -1.73 0.981 49.6% +4 -106 +40 47.0% -0.23 11–12 (48%) 7–16 (30%) 96.1 +1.82
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 1995 1587 124.1 +0.08 -2.77 0.951 49.1% +39 -62 +77 41.3% -0.43 2–3 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 95.2 +0.70
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1696 125.1 +0.74 -2.13 0.940 49.1% -13 -175 -15 50.5% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 100.4 +1.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 110.3 -2.20 -3.61 0.788 45.9% +37 — — 19.4% -1.58 0–7 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 90.9 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1482 100.8 -0.17 -0.96 0.878 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1732 130.9 +0.85 -1.56 0.961 49.1% +1 -104 +85 44.1% -0.36 44–57 (44%) 57–74 (44%) 98.2 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.