H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-4

Jim Courier and Cedric Pioline are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 2-0 RET.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #26 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 2-0 (ret.) Jim Courier #39 Match data
Feb 20, 1997* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #27 6-0 6-2 Jim Courier #16 Match data
Oct 7, 1995* Toulouse ATP 250 SF Hard Jim Courier #8 7-6(2) 6-4 Cedric Pioline #60 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Cedric Pioline #58 6-4 6-4 6-4 Jim Courier #14 Match data
Sep 8, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #14 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 Jim Courier #1 Match data
Aug 16, 1993 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Courier #2 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jim Courier #1 7-6(2) 6-4 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #60 Match data
Aug 17, 1992 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Courier #1 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5