Jim Courier
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 16 | 20 | Mar 17, 1999 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 7 | 5 | 12 | Mar 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jan 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 9 | 2 | 11 | Aug 7, 1999 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Jim Courier vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-0
Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1989 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 6-1 6-2 | Claudio Panatta | Match data | May 17, 1989* | R64 | Italian Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,216 | 489 | 223 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 23 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,749 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,862 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,049 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 68–16 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,074 | 3 | 9 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,890 | 4 | 14 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,989 | 4 | 18 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,852 | 4 | 19 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jim Courier | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 37 | 8 | 45 | 82.2% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 36 | 6 | 42 | 85.7% | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 39 | 9 | 48 | 81.3% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1994 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 49 | 12 | 61 | 80.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1984 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1997 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1998 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 1999 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2000 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 285 | 114 | 399 | 71.4% | 108 | 45 | 153 | 70.6% | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 70 | 47 | 117 | 59.8% | — | 13 | 22 | 35 | 37.1% | 81 | 101 | 182 | 44.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jim Courier | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1987 | 1484 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 1712 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -126 | — | 58.0% | +0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–2 (82%) | — | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1879 | 152.8 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -151 | — | 59.7% | +0.64 | 7–10 (41%) | 12–7 (63%) | — | -3.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1863 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -32 | -251 | 63.3% | +1.10 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -0.68 | 1979 | 1468 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.52 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2049 | 168.0 | +6.14 | +3.91 | 1.266 | 54.2% | +16 | -86 | -347 | 71.0% | +1.28 | 14–5 (74%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -2.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 2075 | 169.6 | +6.83 | +4.55 | 1.332 | 54.9% | +17 | +15 | -351 | 74.4% | +1.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 24–11 (69%) | — | -1.89 | 1981 | 1551 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 51.7% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.79 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1959 | 164.0 | +6.33 | +3.71 | 1.299 | 54.3% | -24 | +192 | -55 | 73.5% | +1.61 | 9–7 (56%) | 15–12 (56%) | — | -1.11 | 1982 | 1642 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -60 | +1 | — | 52.2% | +0.08 | 11–9 (55%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +4.25 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1890 | 155.5 | +5.14 | +2.68 | 1.228 | 53.4% | +9 | +222 | -1 | 66.7% | +1.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–13 (43%) | — | +0.52 | 1983 | 1702 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -30 | — | 43.5% | -0.53 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | -2.80 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1990 | 160.9 | +5.29 | +3.10 | 1.233 | 53.6% | +22 | +69 | -186 | 71.5% | +1.26 | 10–8 (56%) | 26–14 (65%) | — | -0.63 | 1984 | 1603 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +27 | — | 39.1% | -0.97 | 2–8 (20%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.57 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1852 | 152.7 | +4.18 | +1.56 | 1.183 | 52.8% | +59 | +140 | -53 | 60.7% | +0.83 | 4–7 (36%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -0.33 | 1985 | 1592 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +47 | — | 50.6% | +0.22 | 5–7 (42%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.78 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1828 | 150.6 | +2.66 | +1.74 | 1.095 | 51.4% | +66 | +101 | -50 | 62.0% | +0.60 | 8–11 (42%) | 12–10 (55%) | — | -1.90 | 1986 | 1537 | 125.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +32 | — | 41.0% | -0.51 | 2–8 (20%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.47 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1737 | 137.2 | +2.52 | -1.01 | 1.053 | 50.7% | +53 | +134 | — | 51.1% | +0.11 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +0.91 | 1987 | 1548 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | +1 | — | 38.7% | -0.65 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -1.32 |
| 28 | 1999 | 1795 | 135.6 | +4.87 | -0.80 | 1.155 | 52.2% | -5 | +9 | -45 | 56.8% | +0.45 | 12–5 (71%) | 20–11 (65%) | — | +0.59 | 1988 | 1603 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | 57.9% | +0.39 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–0 (100%) | — | +1.20 |
| 29 | 2000 | 1737 | 117.5 | +0.53 | -1.12 | 0.982 | 49.4% | -2 | — | — | 48.0% | -0.44 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.33 | 1989 | 1499 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 13.0% | -2.35 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 |
| Career | — | 2217 | 162.1 | +5.11 | +2.51 | 1.217 | 53.3% | +16 | +52 | -127 | 65.7% | +1.03 | 104–89 (54%) | 174–120 (59%) | 100.1 | -1.47 | — | 1750 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +13 | — | 45.1% | -0.35 | 35–50 (41%) | 38–37 (51%) | 98.2 | +1.53 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Claudio Panatta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 14, 1986 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Francesco Cancellotti | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 21, 1987 | H2H |
| Jimmy Arias | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 3, 1984 | H2H |
| Lawson Duncan | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 25, 1989 | H2H |