Jim Courier
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 16 | 20 | Mar 17, 1999 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 7 | 5 | 12 | Mar 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jan 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 9 | 2 | 11 | Aug 7, 1999 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Dave Randall in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1994 Memphis round of 16 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | 6-3 6-3 | Dave Randall | Match data | Feb 11, 1994* | R16 | Memphis | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,216 | 489 | 223 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 23 |
| Dave Randall | #1,367 | #155 | 261 | 1,595 | 10 | 12 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Dave Randall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,862 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,049 | 1 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 68–16 | 81.0% | #1 | 2,074 | 3 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,890 | 4 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,989 | 4 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,852 | 4 | 19 | 1992 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #260 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1994 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #536 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jim Courier | Dave Randall | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 37 | 8 | 45 | 82.2% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 36 | 6 | 42 | 85.7% | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 39 | 9 | 48 | 81.3% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 49 | 12 | 61 | 80.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1992 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 1997 | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1993 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1994 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 285 | 114 | 399 | 71.4% | 108 | 45 | 153 | 70.6% | 26 | 17 | 43 | 60.5% | 70 | 47 | 117 | 59.8% | — | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 21/22 of Dave Randall's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jim Courier | Dave Randall | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1991 | 60/74 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 63.3% | 73.8% | 56.0% | 62.7% | 44.2% | 67.4% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 69/84 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 60.8% | 77.6% | 55.0% | 64.3% | 45.3% | 68.7% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 61/75 | 4.9 | 2.7 | 60.8% | 75.1% | 56.5% | 67.7% | 45.3% | 67.9% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 54/62 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 61.6% | 75.3% | 53.5% | 59.7% | 45.0% | 66.8% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 66/79 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 62.0% | 75.7% | 54.4% | 67.1% | 47.4% | 67.5% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 40/45 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 60.1% | 74.7% | 53.8% | 57.4% | 43.4% | 66.6% | 39.6% | 1992 | 7/8 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 55.4% | 69.2% | 48.1% | 57.6% | 42.5% | 60.0% | 33.2% |
| 26 | 1997 | 43/53 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 73.7% | 52.8% | 54.7% | 45.2% | 65.1% | 38.2% | 1993 | 11/11 | 5.8 | 4.4 | 55.6% | 70.0% | 43.8% | 55.1% | 44.3% | 58.1% | 37.5% |
| 27 | 1998 | 31/36 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 64.3% | 71.9% | 52.8% | 60.1% | 36.6% | 64.9% | 36.9% | 1994 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 59.1% | 67.8% | 46.9% | 36.5% | 32.5% | 59.4% | 42.6% |
| 28 | 1999 | 41/49 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 66.0% | 75.0% | 55.7% | 62.7% | 39.4% | 68.4% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8/9 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 59.3% | 72.8% | 52.6% | 60.6% | 42.6% | 64.7% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 473/712 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 61.9% | 75.0% | 54.6% | 62.5% | 44.1% | 67.2% | 39.9% | — | 21/22 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 56.0% | 69.4% | 45.7% | 53.3% | 42.0% | 58.9% | 36.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jim Courier | Dave Randall | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1987 | 1484 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 1712 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -126 | — | 58.0% | +0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 9–2 (82%) | — | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1879 | 152.8 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -151 | — | 59.7% | +0.64 | 7–10 (41%) | 12–7 (63%) | — | -3.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1863 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -32 | -251 | 63.3% | +1.10 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 2049 | 168.0 | +6.14 | +3.91 | 1.266 | 54.2% | +16 | -86 | -347 | 71.0% | +1.28 | 14–5 (74%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -2.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 2075 | 169.6 | +6.83 | +4.55 | 1.332 | 54.9% | +17 | +15 | -351 | 74.4% | +1.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 24–11 (69%) | — | -1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 1959 | 164.0 | +6.33 | +3.71 | 1.299 | 54.3% | -24 | +192 | -55 | 73.5% | +1.61 | 9–7 (56%) | 15–12 (56%) | — | -1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 1890 | 155.5 | +5.14 | +2.68 | 1.228 | 53.4% | +9 | +222 | -1 | 66.7% | +1.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–13 (43%) | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 1990 | 160.9 | +5.29 | +3.10 | 1.233 | 53.6% | +22 | +69 | -186 | 71.5% | +1.26 | 10–8 (56%) | 26–14 (65%) | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 1852 | 152.7 | +4.18 | +1.56 | 1.183 | 52.8% | +59 | +140 | -53 | 60.7% | +0.83 | 4–7 (36%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -0.33 | 1992 | 1507 | 110.7 | -0.59 | -1.99 | 0.830 | 46.8% | +61 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.95 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.52 |
| 26 | 1997 | 1828 | 150.6 | +2.66 | +1.74 | 1.095 | 51.4% | +66 | +101 | -50 | 62.0% | +0.60 | 8–11 (42%) | 12–10 (55%) | — | -1.90 | 1993 | 1554 | 113.9 | -1.72 | -0.36 | 0.895 | 48.1% | +21 | — | — | 48.4% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.14 |
| 27 | 1998 | 1737 | 137.2 | +2.52 | -1.01 | 1.053 | 50.7% | +53 | +134 | — | 51.1% | +0.11 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +0.91 | 1994 | 1593 | 115.7 | -1.44 | +1.68 | 1.049 | 50.1% | +13 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.12 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 28 | 1999 | 1795 | 135.6 | +4.87 | -0.80 | 1.155 | 52.2% | -5 | +9 | -45 | 56.8% | +0.45 | 12–5 (71%) | 20–11 (65%) | — | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 1737 | 117.5 | +0.53 | -1.12 | 0.982 | 49.4% | -2 | — | — | 48.0% | -0.44 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2217 | 162.1 | +5.11 | +2.51 | 1.217 | 53.3% | +16 | +52 | -127 | 65.7% | +1.03 | 104–89 (54%) | 174–120 (59%) | 100.1 | -1.47 | — | 1596 | 116.3 | -1.30 | -0.61 | 0.896 | 47.9% | +34 | — | — | 45.0% | -0.60 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.3 | +1.95 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 12 | 12 | 24 | Feb 18, 1999 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 16 | 20 | Mar 17, 1999 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 7 | 5 | 12 | Mar 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jan 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 9 | 2 | 11 | Aug 7, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 5, 1993 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 11, 1994 | H2H |
| David Rikl | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Jim Grabb | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 9, 1994 | H2H |
| Brian Macphie | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |