H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1995 Stockholm Open quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #71 6-3 7-6(4) Jim Courier #7 Match data Nov 11, 1995* QF Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier David Prinosil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier David Prinosil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier David Prinosil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.