H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0

Jim Courier holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1996 Roland Garros round of 64 6-3 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #8 6-3 6-2 6-2 David Rikl #98 Match data May 31, 1996* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jim Courier #11 6-4 6-0 7-6(2) David Rikl #123 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.