H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-1

Jim Courier and Diego Perez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1992 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 32 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Diego Perez
URU Age 64 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diego Perez #157 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Jim Courier #1 Match data Jul 23, 1992* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jim Courier #173 6-1 6-2 Diego Perez #144 Match data Apr 29, 1988* R16 Charleston ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Diego Perez #1,263 #27 389 1,824 195 213 47.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Diego Perez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,486 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% #211 1,473 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1981 16–15 51.6% #94 1,652 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1982 11–16 40.7% #100 1,657 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1983 19–14 57.6% #51 1,728 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1984 15–16 48.4% #52 1,659 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1985 30–21 58.8% #55 1,763 0 1
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1986 30–25 54.5% #61 1,692 0 1
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1987 15–19 44.1% #116 1,668 0 1
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1988 12–17 41.4% #142 1,608 0 1
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1989 17–17 50.0% #112 1,651 0 1
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1990 12–18 40.0% #132 1,594 0 1
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1991 5–9 35.7% #176 1,572 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1992 11–10 52.4% #128 1,619 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1993 2–13 13.3% #253 1,511 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #661 1,498 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Diego Perez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 11 15 26 42.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 28 16 44 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 22 18 40 55.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 15 13 28 53.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 32 49 81 39.5% 162 156 318 50.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 44/51 of Diego Perez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Diego Perez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 1991 10/14 2.5 1.6 68.2% 64.4% 54.5% 54.3% 44.9% 61.3% 42.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 20/21 3.0 2.4 60.0% 63.8% 50.4% 52.5% 45.3% 58.6% 43.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 13/15 1.8 3.7 58.0% 60.3% 44.7% 49.0% 31.2% 53.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 0.0 3.0 63.0% 47.1% 43.3% 60.0% 28.6% 45.7% 42.9%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 44/408 2.5 2.6 61.4% 62.5% 49.5% 52.0% 40.7% 57.3% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Diego Perez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 1979 1486 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1980 1473 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.11
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1981 1652 145.1 — — — — — +48 — 56.3% +0.03 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.6 -0.45
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1982 1658 141.1 — — — — — +31 — 47.8% -0.18 4–9 (31%) 4–6 (40%) 94.1 -0.92
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1983 1728 141.3 — — — — -150 +8 — 54.1% +0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 -0.26
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1984 1659 138.8 — — — — -149 +78 — 52.0% +0.03 2–8 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 90.7 -0.21
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1985 1763 138.5 — — — — -270 +48 — 53.9% +0.37 9–2 (82%) 3–6 (33%) 105.7 +0.70
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1986 1693 137.4 — — — — -108 +6 — 51.6% +0.21 9–7 (56%) 5–9 (36%) 98.5 +0.43
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1987 1669 132.4 — — — — -52 -12 — 44.7% -0.31 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 99.3 -2.18
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1988 1609 125.1 — — — — -4 0 — 45.3% -0.41 8–9 (47%) 4–6 (40%) 97.8 -0.14
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1989 1651 135.0 — — — — -57 +26 — 50.0% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 99.9 -1.06
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 1990 1594 127.7 — — — — -38 +95 — 42.3% -0.83 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.8 -0.79
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 1991 1573 118.5 -0.06 +0.92 1.086 51.0% -20 +66 — 41.7% -0.36 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.2 +0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1619 123.6 -1.94 +2.72 1.058 51.0% -104 +109 — 50.9% +0.25 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.51
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 108.3 -3.89 -1.43 0.785 45.0% -47 +102 — 29.3% -1.93 0–6 (0%) 2–0 — -0.34
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1498 98.3 +1.21 -2.79 0.789 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1825 141.5 -2.02 +0.96 0.967 49.1% -84 +41 — 48.7% -0.11 58–74 (44%) 41–56 (42%) 92.5 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.