H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Eric Taino H2H: 1-0

Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Eric Taino in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 2000 San Jose round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Eric Taino
PHI Age 51 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #44 6-3 6-4 Eric Taino #397 Match data Feb 10, 2000* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Eric Taino #1,105 #122 320 1,566 11 18 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Eric Taino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 — — — — — — —
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 — — — — — — —
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 — — — — — — —
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 — — — — — — —
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1999 1–2 33.3% #401 1,516 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 2000 4–4 50.0% #205 1,550 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 2001 0–2 0.0% #241 1,537 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 2002 0–1 0.0% #179 1,529 0 0
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2003 5–6 45.5% #133 1,523 0 0
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 2004 0–2 0.0% #286 1,438 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #240 1,440 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Eric Taino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2003 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 11 16 27 40.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 27/29 of Eric Taino's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Eric Taino
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1999 3/3 3.7 2.0 58.2% 66.6% 59.5% 53.6% 14.3% 63.4% 28.9%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 2000 6/8 2.5 1.0 57.6% 67.2% 49.7% 46.5% 33.0% 60.2% 35.0%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 2001 2/2 6.5 4.5 44.6% 70.2% 45.8% 47.2% 25.0% 56.0% 30.5%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 2002 1/1 6.0 3.0 50.8% 47.6% 55.7% 55.6% 20.0% 51.6% 31.3%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 2003 11/11 7.1 3.5 51.0% 77.0% 53.2% 61.8% 38.0% 65.1% 31.5%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 2004 2/2 1.5 4.5 52.9% 64.7% 39.3% 50.0% 6.3% 51.4% 32.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 6.5 2.5 68.8% 74.6% 53.8% 25.0% 14.3% 67.9% 32.7%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 27/29 5.1 2.8 54.3% 71.0% 51.7% 52.6% 28.5% 61.8% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Eric Taino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1999 1517 118.7 +1.56 +0.61 0.788 46.2% +35 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 1–0 — -0.31
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 2000 1550 107.0 -1.10 -1.62 0.880 47.4% +24 — — 47.1% -0.53 1–0 1–0 — +0.11
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 2001 1537 100.3 -0.75 -2.13 0.693 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.50 — — — -0.22
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 2002 1529 96.8 -1.80 -1.16 0.646 41.9% — — — 25.0% -2.75 — 1–0 — +0.14
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 2003 1523 110.4 +0.55 -3.17 0.901 48.4% +59 — — 44.4% -0.33 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 2004 1439 90.9 -0.63 -0.14 0.672 42.2% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1441 97.4 +0.38 -0.01 1.020 48.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1415 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1415 103.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1566 105.9 +0.01 -1.80 0.840 46.9% +44 — — 39.1% -0.94 4–3 (57%) 8–5 (62%) 107.3 +0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.