H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jim Courier vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-1
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1999 Roland Garros second round 2-6 6-3 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 2-6 6-3 6-4 6-1 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |