H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 7-0

Jim Courier holds a 7–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1997 Australian Open third round 6-1 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jim Courier #16 6-1 7-6(3) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #93 Match data
Feb 29, 1996* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jim Courier #7 6-1 6-1 Jeff Tarango #74 Match data
Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jim Courier #8 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 6-3 Jeff Tarango #73 Match data
May 31, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jim Courier #13 6-4 6-3 6-3 Jeff Tarango #70 Match data
Mar 9, 1994* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jim Courier #5 2-6 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #101 Match data
Jul 29, 1993* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jim Courier #2 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #69 Match data
May 30, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jim Courier #2 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 Jeff Tarango #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2