H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 1-0

Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1993 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #2 6-1 6-4 Jeremy Bates #83 Match data Apr 16, 1993* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.