H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 3-1
Jim Courier holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jim Courier leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1991 US Open second round 6-3 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-2 6-0 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-3 6-1 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| May 3, 1989* | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jim Courier | 7-5 4-6 7-6 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1988* | Charleston | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |