H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 3-0

Jim Courier holds a 3–0 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1992 Antwerp third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 12, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jim Courier #1 6-3 6-3 Jimmy Connors #84 Match data
Oct 31, 1991* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Jim Courier #3 6-2 6-3 Jimmy Connors #47 Match data
Sep 8, 1991* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Jim Courier #5 6-3 6-3 6-2 Jimmy Connors #174 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109