H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 2-2

Jim Courier and Jonathan Stark are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jonathan Stark
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jonathan Stark #130 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-4 Jim Courier #8 Match data Jun 26, 1996* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jim Courier #12 7-5 6-1 Jonathan Stark #64 Match data Apr 21, 1995* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jonathan Stark #77 6-4 6-2 Jim Courier #1 Match data Apr 9, 1993* R16 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Courier #1 6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 Jonathan Stark #81 Match data Feb 13, 1993* QF Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Jonathan Stark #829 #36 913 1,802 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Jonathan Stark
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #403 1,482 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #1007 1,476 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1991 1–3 25.0% #243 1,466 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1992 19–19 50.0% #85 1,632 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 28–23 54.9% #38 1,760 0 1
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1994 26–23 53.1% #65 1,701 0 1
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1995 18–24 42.9% #100 1,635 0 1
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1996 19–16 54.3% #68 1,729 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 17–23 42.5% #96 1,645 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1998 4–11 26.7% #266 1,576 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1999 3–4 42.9% #300 1,587 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 2000 0–1 0.0% #512 1,575 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #809 1,556 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Jonathan Stark
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 16 15 31 51.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1994 19 15 34 55.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 10 15 25 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 5 1 6 83.3%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 84 101 185 45.4% 7 12 19 36.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 23 15 38 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 247/283 of Jonathan Stark's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Jonathan Stark
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1991 2/4 9.5 4.5 55.3% 87.0% 61.2% 50.0% 43.8% 75.3% 38.3%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1992 32/38 7.8 3.4 57.8% 73.9% 51.2% 63.5% 43.7% 64.0% 35.2%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1993 43/51 7.9 4.1 59.6% 75.4% 51.9% 58.3% 41.6% 66.0% 37.0%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1994 44/49 8.4 3.4 59.4% 75.5% 53.5% 66.5% 42.5% 66.6% 34.6%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1995 36/42 8.4 3.6 59.8% 74.9% 48.1% 57.2% 31.2% 63.9% 34.0%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1996 33/35 9.8 2.7 61.8% 77.5% 50.3% 61.8% 48.9% 67.3% 36.6%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1997 40/40 12.0 4.4 58.1% 77.9% 47.2% 52.9% 35.1% 65.2% 36.1%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1998 10/15 9.7 3.9 57.8% 73.2% 42.6% 53.3% 50.2% 60.5% 31.6%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1999 5/7 7.8 5.6 56.3% 75.0% 54.9% 57.9% 37.3% 66.2% 34.1%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 2000 1/1 3.0 4.0 57.4% 67.7% 47.8% 25.0% 0.0% 59.3% 27.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/1 11.0 5.0 58.7% 88.6% 54.8% 66.7% 20.0% 74.7% 24.7%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 247/285 9.0 3.7 59.2% 75.9% 50.3% 59.5% 40.5% 65.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Jonathan Stark
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 1988 1483 96.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 1990 1477 103.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.08
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 1991 1467 107.7 +1.68 +0.55 1.551 55.2% — — — 33.3% -0.44 0–1 — — +0.20
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 1992 1632 131.9 +1.77 -1.58 0.977 49.8% +6 -134 +30 51.6% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — +1.18
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1993 1761 148.8 +4.38 -0.55 1.088 51.2% +9 -195 -98 56.3% +0.48 5–9 (36%) 12–13 (48%) — -2.43
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1994 1701 136.5 +4.00 -2.92 1.035 50.6% +27 — -76 51.3% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.67
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1995 1636 139.5 +1.82 -2.24 0.944 49.1% +35 -83 -8 41.0% -0.33 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.07
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 1996 1730 141.3 +3.90 -0.61 1.121 51.8% +1 — -41 55.1% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.71
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 1997 1645 132.9 +2.38 -1.22 1.039 50.5% +18 -89 +39 45.8% -0.21 7–11 (39%) 16–13 (55%) — +0.04
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 1998 1577 115.9 +0.36 -2.34 0.799 46.3% +3 — — 33.3% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 1999 1588 117.9 +0.64 -0.69 1.011 49.8% +12 — +49 44.4% +0.44 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.10
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 2000 1575 100.2 -0.93 +0.34 0.677 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1557 100.1 -1.00 -0.03 0.974 49.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.20
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1802 142.5 +2.91 -1.53 1.024 50.3% +16 -133 -17 48.7% +0.02 35–54 (39%) 70–68 (51%) 97.2 -0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.