H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Kevin Curren H2H: 2-2
Jim Courier and Kevin Curren are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1992 Tokyo Outdoor third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-1 6-1 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1991* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-4 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kevin Curren | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1988* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kevin Curren | 6-1 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |