H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-0

Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1993 Indianapolis semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Luiz Mattar
BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #2 6-3 6-2 Luiz Mattar #70 Match data Aug 21, 1993* SF Indianapolis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Luiz Mattar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 — — — — — — —
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 — — — — — — —
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Luiz Mattar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 7 1 8 87.5%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Luiz Mattar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Luiz Mattar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) — -1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.11 1986 1567 121.0 — — — — -54 +30 — 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.15
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52 1987 1697 124.2 — — — — -13 -71 — 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) — +3.23
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) — -0.63 1988 1679 135.5 — — — — -65 +52 — 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.58
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.33 1989 1682 126.0 — — — — +17 -25 — 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) — +3.17
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.90 1990 1697 127.6 — — — — +63 -53 — 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.59
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.91 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.26
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.59 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 — 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.94
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.33 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 — 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 — 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 — — 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.33
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.