H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 4-0

Jim Courier holds a 4–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1995 Toulouse round of 32 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #8 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Oct 5, 1995* R32 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jim Courier #9 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Martin Damm Sr Match data Sep 30, 1995* QF Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jim Courier #1 7-6(6) 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 8, 1993* R32 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Courier #1 6-2 6-1 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 17, 1992* R16 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jim Courier Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 — — — — — — —
1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 — — — — — — —
1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 — — — — — — —
1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 — — — — — — —
1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 — — — — — — —
1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 — — — — — — —
1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 — — — — — — —
1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —
1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 — — — — — — —
2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jim Courier Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jim Courier Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.