H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 4-0

Jim Courier holds a 4–0 lead over Mikael Tillstrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Atlanta round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Mikael Tillstrom
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #67 6-3 6-4 Mikael Tillstrom #129 Match data Apr 29, 1999* R32 Atlanta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jim Courier #50 6-4 7-5 Mikael Tillstrom #114 Match data Apr 22, 1999* R32 Orlando ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jim Courier #117 6-4 2-6 7-6(3) Mikael Tillstrom #83 Match data Oct 16, 1998* R16 Brisbane International ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Jim Courier #9 7-6(5) 6-3 Mikael Tillstrom #46 Match data Aug 15, 1996* R32 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Mikael Tillstrom #506 #39 966 1,833 109 109 50.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Mikael Tillstrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1992 7–4 63.6% #141 1,610 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1993 0–3 0.0% #438 1,564 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1994 4–2 66.7% #149 1,659 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1995 4–3 57.1% #116 1,700 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1996 24–19 55.8% #47 1,757 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1997 18–22 45.0% #68 1,644 0 1
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1998 20–21 48.8% #85 1,644 0 1
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1999 15–18 45.5% #79 1,685 0 1
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2000 17–17 50.0% #80 1,669 0 1
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Mikael Tillstrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1992 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1994 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1995 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1997 15 15 30 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 12 8 20 60.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2000 13 11 24 54.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 65 53 118 55.1% 27 33 60 45.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 14 15 29 48.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 191/218 of Mikael Tillstrom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Mikael Tillstrom
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1992 11/11 3.5 2.1 53.7% 68.0% 49.2% 45.2% 53.6% 59.3% 42.5%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1993 3/3 1.3 1.3 57.3% 53.6% 37.5% 49.4% 42.8% 47.1% 33.3%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1994 6/6 4.8 3.3 59.9% 71.9% 49.8% 52.2% 35.7% 63.3% 42.7%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1995 6/7 3.3 2.7 55.5% 72.0% 50.2% 62.8% 36.6% 62.2% 38.5%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1996 35/43 4.3 2.6 61.4% 68.6% 50.5% 58.3% 43.0% 61.7% 37.2%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1997 36/40 4.2 4.0 56.3% 67.8% 48.1% 57.3% 43.5% 59.0% 37.0%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1998 36/41 4.0 4.1 56.1% 70.5% 49.8% 55.9% 45.3% 61.4% 39.8%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1999 29/33 3.2 3.4 60.4% 64.3% 47.6% 54.4% 38.7% 57.1% 37.2%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 2000 29/34 5.4 3.1 61.8% 71.0% 50.7% 54.3% 43.1% 63.3% 37.8%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 191/218 4.1 3.3 58.6% 68.4% 49.2% 55.5% 43.1% 60.4% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Mikael Tillstrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1992 1610 130.5 -0.02 +0.86 1.043 51.1% — +50 — 60.0% +0.60 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1993 1565 98.7 -2.61 -4.01 0.629 40.6% — +48 — 14.3% -3.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1994 1659 123.3 +0.12 +3.90 1.163 52.0% — +33 — 65.0% +0.95 1–1 2–0 — -0.08
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1995 1700 128.4 +0.34 +0.88 1.020 50.0% -116 +8 — 57.9% +0.10 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.51
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1996 1758 143.5 +0.31 -0.34 0.972 49.6% -20 -38 -90 50.4% -0.11 14–6 (70%) 13–10 (57%) 110.0 -1.65
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1997 1645 136.5 -2.09 -0.47 0.901 48.2% +49 +14 — 46.1% -0.39 7–10 (41%) 12–6 (67%) 101.9 -0.19
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1998 1645 134.6 -0.69 +1.32 1.030 50.7% +38 -20 — 49.5% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.3 +1.60
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1999 1686 128.2 -2.99 +0.64 0.869 47.5% +38 -88 — 44.3% -0.57 9–5 (64%) 6–4 (60%) 105.4 -0.10
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 2000 1669 136.1 +0.93 +0.39 1.030 50.2% +50 -32 — 49.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.68
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1833 142.0 -0.81 +0.39 0.964 49.3% +27 -4 -90 49.1% -0.13 48–38 (56%) 50–34 (60%) 111.2 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.