H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Nicolas Pereira H2H: 2-1

Jim Courier holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Pereira in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1995 San Jose round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Pereira
VEN Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Courier #11 6-4 6-1 Nicolas Pereira #103 Match data Feb 10, 1995* R16 San Jose ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jim Courier #12 7-6(3) 6-4 Nicolas Pereira #116 Match data Jul 28, 1994* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Nicolas Pereira #132 6-2 6-4 Jim Courier #24 Match data Nov 23, 1989* R32 Itaparica ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Nicolas Pereira #1,101 #74 658 1,690 64 115 35.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Nicolas Pereira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #151 1,526 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1989 12–21 36.4% #121 1,582 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1990 5–15 25.0% #238 1,503 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1991 2–6 25.0% #145 1,483 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1992 0–1 0.0% #129 1,466 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 4–11 26.7% #142 1,472 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1994 10–14 41.7% #116 1,547 0 1
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1995 14–18 43.8% #122 1,610 0 1
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1996 15–20 42.9% #110 1,570 0 2
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 0–7 0.0% #472 1,489 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 — — — — — — —
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Nicolas Pereira
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 9 12 21 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 7 11 18 38.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 33 61 94 35.1% 15 26 41 36.6% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 102/122 of Nicolas Pereira's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Nicolas Pereira
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1991 8/8 5.6 2.9 57.3% 68.6% 47.3% 54.5% 29.8% 59.6% 33.7%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1992 1/1 7.0 8.0 49.5% 61.2% 44.0% 55.6% 50.0% 52.5% 36.2%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1993 13/15 6.1 4.8 59.3% 71.0% 41.2% 49.3% 35.4% 58.4% 33.1%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1994 18/24 6.6 3.1 61.4% 73.1% 47.4% 58.0% 35.6% 63.6% 32.1%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1995 25/32 6.6 2.9 61.2% 73.1% 47.8% 61.6% 38.7% 63.3% 35.1%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1996 30/35 5.7 2.9 60.9% 73.0% 48.5% 60.2% 34.1% 63.3% 35.3%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1997 7/7 5.0 3.9 63.7% 67.8% 38.3% 56.6% 32.2% 57.2% 29.0%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 102/179 6.1 3.3 60.7% 72.0% 46.4% 58.0% 35.3% 61.9% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Nicolas Pereira
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 1988 1527 112.7 — — — — — — — 55.6% +0.22 0–1 1–1 — -0.20
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1989 1583 133.9 — — — — +11 -61 -18 42.2% -0.60 2–7 (22%) 10–6 (63%) 101.5 -1.22
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1990 1504 113.9 — — — — +43 -15 — 30.6% -1.25 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) 97.7 +0.53
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1991 1483 107.0 -0.60 -1.86 0.833 47.2% +34 — — 31.6% -0.90 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.4 +0.13
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1992 1467 98.9 +0.20 -0.48 0.762 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.23
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1993 1472 114.4 -1.19 -3.12 0.797 46.3% +45 0 +69 35.7% -1.07 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 +0.31
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1994 1547 123.5 +1.64 -3.77 0.880 47.9% -65 +8 +37 42.9% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 102.8 +0.90
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1995 1610 125.6 +1.27 -1.84 0.956 49.4% -25 -18 — 47.1% -0.32 3–7 (30%) 5–12 (29%) 91.0 +0.61
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1996 1570 123.0 +1.01 -1.88 0.962 49.1% +2 -46 +100 45.9% -0.53 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 96.1 +1.11
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1997 1489 103.4 -1.59 -3.08 0.679 43.7% +28 — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.21
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1690 127.5 +0.59 -2.43 0.889 48.0% +7 -20 +57 40.6% -0.69 16–36 (31%) 40–48 (45%) 90.2 +1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.