H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 1-0
Jim Courier holds a 1–0 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1992 Hong Kong third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Patrik Kuhnen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |