H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 7-1

Jim Courier holds a 7–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1997 Los Angeles quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-5.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 1997* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Jim Courier #29 7-6(5) 7-5 Richard Krajicek #15 Match data
Mar 22, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jim Courier #26 7-6(6) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #6 Match data
Jun 6, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Jim Courier #2 6-1 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 Richard Krajicek #13 Match data
Nov 16, 1992 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Carpet Jim Courier #1 6-7(4) 7-6(1) 7-5 Richard Krajicek #10 Match data
Nov 14, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 SF Carpet Richard Krajicek #13 4-6 6-4 7-5 Jim Courier #1 Match data
Apr 12, 1992* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 F Hard Jim Courier #2 6-4 6-4 7-6(3) Richard Krajicek #30 Match data
Feb 21, 1992* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jim Courier #1 6-3 3-6 6-3 Richard Krajicek #27 Match data
Jan 26, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Jim Courier #2 (w/o) Richard Krajicek #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17