H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Courier vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-2
Richey Reneberg holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 2–0 on grass, while Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Halle quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1996* | Halle | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Richey Reneberg | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1995* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Richey Reneberg | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(10) | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1991* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-4 6-3 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Richey Reneberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |