H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-2

Richey Reneberg holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 2–0 on grass, while Jim Courier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Halle Open quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richey Reneberg #23 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 Jim Courier #8 Match data Jun 22, 1996* QF Halle Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Richey Reneberg #43 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(10) Jim Courier #14 Match data Jun 22, 1995* R32 Halle Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jim Courier #18 6-4 6-3 Richey Reneberg #33 Match data Mar 21, 1991* SF Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Richey Reneberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Richey Reneberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8%
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Richey Reneberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.