H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Jim Courier vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 2-1

Jim Courier holds a 2–1 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 1998 Philadelphia round of 16 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Courier
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sebastien Lareau #140 7-6(5) 7-5 Jim Courier #41 Match data Feb 27, 1998* R16 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Courier #15 6-3 6-4 6-4 Sebastien Lareau #100 Match data Sep 1, 1995* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jim Courier #13 6-4 6-3 Sebastien Lareau #95 Match data Jul 27, 1995* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,216 489 223 68.7% 4 5 0 5 9 23
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,879 0 1 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,862 0 1 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,049 1 4 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1992 68–16 81.0% #1 2,074 3 9 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,890 4 14 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,989 4 18 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,852 4 19 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,737 4 23 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Courier Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 12 10 22 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 16 8 24 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 37 8 45 82.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1992 36 6 42 85.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 7 22 68.2% 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 12 1 13 92.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1994 17 8 25 68.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 49 12 61 80.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1997 26 10 36 72.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1999 14 12 26 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285 114 399 71.4% 108 45 153 70.6% 26 17 43 60.5% 70 47 117 59.8% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 473/566 of Jim Courier's and 180/204 of Sebastien Lareau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Courier Sebastien Lareau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/2 13.0 6.5 44.7% 74.2% 46.6% 49.3% 21.8% 58.6% 38.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 3/3 3.0 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 47.5% 71.6% 33.3% 60.1% 43.6%
20 1991 60/74 5.4 2.2 63.3% 73.8% 56.0% 62.7% 44.2% 67.4% 41.3% 1993 2/5 6.5 12.0 49.5% 67.9% 34.2% 35.0% 40.3% 51.0% 33.7%
21 1992 69/84 5.3 2.4 60.8% 77.6% 55.0% 64.3% 45.3% 68.7% 41.7% 1994 14/16 7.1 6.0 54.3% 71.6% 41.9% 59.4% 34.6% 58.4% 35.9%
22 1993 61/75 4.9 2.7 60.8% 75.1% 56.5% 67.7% 45.3% 67.9% 41.7% 1995 28/29 8.4 5.7 56.5% 76.7% 43.5% 58.3% 37.7% 62.2% 36.7%
23 1994 54/62 4.1 2.5 61.6% 75.3% 53.5% 59.7% 45.0% 66.8% 40.8% 1996 26/30 6.1 4.0 59.9% 71.5% 50.8% 64.3% 47.9% 63.2% 39.9%
24 1995 66/79 5.4 2.9 62.0% 75.7% 54.4% 67.1% 47.4% 67.5% 40.1% 1997 23/23 3.8 6.1 61.6% 68.4% 40.6% 53.6% 40.6% 57.7% 38.5%
25 1996 40/45 5.9 3.2 60.1% 74.7% 53.8% 57.4% 43.4% 66.6% 39.6% 1998 32/38 7.6 3.8 66.4% 70.8% 45.2% 63.1% 40.7% 62.4% 37.7%
26 1997 43/53 4.8 3.0 59.8% 73.7% 52.8% 54.7% 45.2% 65.1% 38.2% 1999 25/30 6.4 3.0 61.4% 69.6% 51.7% 65.1% 48.9% 62.4% 35.8%
27 1998 31/36 4.9 2.2 64.3% 71.9% 52.8% 60.1% 36.6% 64.9% 36.9% 2000 13/16 6.2 3.8 62.2% 67.8% 49.9% 56.8% 39.7% 60.7% 35.5%
28 1999 41/49 6.0 2.5 66.0% 75.0% 55.7% 62.7% 39.4% 68.4% 36.5% 2001 12/12 4.4 3.0 61.3% 68.4% 46.5% 53.3% 34.0% 60.1% 33.5%
29 2000 8/9 6.3 2.8 59.3% 72.8% 52.6% 60.6% 42.6% 64.7% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 473/712 5.2 2.6 61.9% 75.0% 54.6% 62.5% 44.1% 67.2% 39.9% — 180/205 6.5 4.5 60.5% 71.0% 46.1% 59.9% 41.1% 61.1% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Courier Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1987 1484 102.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.12 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
17 1988 1712 137.9 — — — — +4 -126 — 58.0% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 9–2 (82%) 104.7 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1879 152.8 — — — — -3 -151 — 59.7% +0.64 7–10 (41%) 12–7 (63%) 102.2 -3.51 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 1990 1863 156.8 — — — — +8 -32 -251 63.3% +1.10 8–8 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 97.9 -0.68 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 1991 2049 168.0 +6.14 +3.91 1.266 54.2% +16 -86 -347 71.0% +1.28 14–5 (74%) 12–9 (57%) 106.5 -2.20 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1992 2075 169.6 +6.83 +4.55 1.332 54.9% +17 +15 -351 74.4% +1.70 12–5 (71%) 24–11 (69%) 105.2 -1.89 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1993 1959 164.0 +6.33 +3.71 1.299 54.3% -24 +192 -55 73.5% +1.61 9–7 (56%) 15–12 (56%) 95.7 -1.11 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 1994 1890 155.5 +5.14 +2.68 1.228 53.4% +9 +222 -1 66.7% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 90.0 +0.52 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 1995 1990 160.9 +5.29 +3.10 1.233 53.6% +22 +69 -186 71.5% +1.26 10–8 (56%) 26–14 (65%) 102.8 -0.63 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 1996 1852 152.7 +4.18 +1.56 1.183 52.8% +59 +140 -53 60.7% +0.83 4–7 (36%) 12–11 (52%) 93.2 -0.33 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 1997 1828 150.6 +2.66 +1.74 1.095 51.4% +66 +101 -50 62.0% +0.60 8–11 (42%) 12–10 (55%) 92.2 -1.90 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 1998 1737 137.2 +2.52 -1.01 1.053 50.7% +53 +134 — 51.1% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 97.8 +0.91 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 1999 1795 135.6 +4.87 -0.80 1.155 52.2% -5 +9 -45 56.8% +0.45 12–5 (71%) 20–11 (65%) 110.4 +0.59 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 2000 1737 117.5 +0.53 -1.12 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 48.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 +0.33 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2217 162.1 +5.11 +2.51 1.217 53.3% +16 +52 -127 65.7% +1.03 104–89 (54%) 174–120 (59%) 100.1 -1.47 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.