H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jim Courier vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-3
Thomas Johansson holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1999 Canada Masters quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1999* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 7-6(6) 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1997* | Singapore | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1997* | Beijing | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-3 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Courier | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |