H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Courier vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 4-1

Jim Courier holds a 4–1 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1998 Shanghai third round 1-6 6-3 7-6(6).

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 1998* Shanghai ATP 250 R32 Carpet Todd Woodbridge #71 1-6 6-3 7-6(6) Jim Courier #102 Match data
Mar 14, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jim Courier #8 6-3 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #24 Match data
Jan 21, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jim Courier #8 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 3-6 8-6 Todd Woodbridge #29 Match data
Nov 10, 1995* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jim Courier #7 6-4 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #36 Match data
Feb 11, 1993* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Courier #1 6-3 6-4 Todd Woodbridge #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,857 237 229 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Courier Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,702 0 0
21 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9 1992 25–22 53.2% #54 1,684 0 0
22 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,664 0 0
23 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,661 0 0
24 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,810 0 1
25 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19 1996 32–23 58.2% #36 1,744 0 1
26 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,796 0 2
27 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,714 0 2
28 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,601 0 2
29 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,596 0 2