H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jim Delaney vs Geoff Masters H2H: 0-2
Geoff Masters holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Delaney in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Geoff Masters leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Geoff Masters won the 1976 Sydney Indoor final 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1976* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Geoff Masters | 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-3 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1975* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Geoff Masters | 6-3 6-7 7-6 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Delaney | #262 | #59 | 0 | 1,676 | 78 | 131 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Geoff Masters | #826 | #41 | 0 | 1,881 | 238 | 255 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Delaney | Geoff Masters | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #64 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #133 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 27–31 | 46.6% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1979 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #276 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #78 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #269 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1981 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #269 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #62 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #143 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |