H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Delaney vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 2-1
Jim Delaney holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jim Delaney leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Delaney won the 1976 Wimbledon first round 6-2 3-6 6-8 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jim Delaney | 6-2 3-6 6-8 6-3 6-3 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1975* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jim Delaney | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1974 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jurgen Fassbender | 6-4 6-4 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Delaney | #262 | #59 | 0 | 1,676 | 78 | 131 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Delaney | Jurgen Fassbender | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1972 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #64 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #133 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #276 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #269 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1981 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #269 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #143 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |