H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-1

Jim Grabb and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1993 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 7-6(4) 0-6 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #54 6-3 7-6(4) 0-6 4-6 6-3 Andrei Cherkasov #29 Match data Jan 20, 1993* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrei Cherkasov #21 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 Jim Grabb #87 Match data Jan 9, 1992* R32 ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4%
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.78
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.83
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) — -1.80
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) — -2.86
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.60
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.62
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.66
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.31
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.