H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 0-1

Bill Scanlon holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1986 Newport fourth round 6-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 11, 1986* Newport ATP 250 R16 Grass Bill Scanlon #151 6-7 6-4 6-4 Jim Grabb #266 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —