H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs David Pate H2H: 0-2

David Pate holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1986 Japan Open round of 16 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #24 6-4 6-4 Jim Grabb #129 Match data Oct 17, 1986* R16 Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
David Pate #29 6-3 6-4 Jim Grabb #203 Match data Oct 11, 1986* QF Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
20 1982 2–5 28.6% 1,484 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1494 104.5 0.0% -1.00 0–2 -0.08
20 1982 1485 108.5 +40 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 +0.29
21 1985 1560 123.7 +46 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 +0.16 1983 1529 119.4 +10 +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) +0.28
22 1986 1636 129.6 +34 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) +0.05 1984 1744 140.4 +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) +0.33
23 1987 1688 137.5 +49 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) +1.31 1985 1743 138.8 +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) +0.85
24 1988 1562 123.6 +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) -0.31 1986 1788 146.3 +34 -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) +0.85
25 1989 1768 139.4 +19 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) -1.18 1987 1751 141.1 +30 -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) -0.04
26 1990 1689 132.1 +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) -0.10 1988 1716 139.3 +41 -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) -1.56
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) +0.72 1989 1656 135.9 +19 +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) -2.42
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) +1.42 1990 1658 127.8 -22 +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) +0.85
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) +0.36 1991 1596 133.2 +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) -0.86
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) +0.09 1992 1574 104.4 +24 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) -0.43
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) -1.25 1993 1548 104.3 +35 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 +0.22
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) +0.17 1994 1561 100.6 40.0% -2.20 1–0 -0.12
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.17 1995 1542 99.0 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.14
Career 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 1875 143.1 +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.