H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jim Grabb vs David Pate H2H: 0-2

David Pate holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1986 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 1986* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard David Pate #24 6-4 6-4 Jim Grabb #129 Match data
Oct 11, 1986* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard David Pate #29 6-3 6-4 Jim Grabb #203 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,874 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,741 0 1
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,787 0 1
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,751 0 2
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,716 0 2
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,595 0 2
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,572 0 2
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,547 0 2
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,560 0 2
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,541 0 2