H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 0-1

Eliot Teltscher holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eliot Teltscher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1987 Scottsdale round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Eliot Teltscher
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eliot Teltscher #38 6-3 6-3 Jim Grabb #63 Match data Oct 9, 1987* R16 Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Eliot Teltscher #1,093 #6 15 2,093 392 207 65.4% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Eliot Teltscher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1976 1–1 50.0% #239 1,503 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 9–14 39.1% #95 1,535 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1978 24–18 57.1% #42 1,753 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1979 42–25 62.7% #25 1,851 0 2
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1980 71–27 72.4% #10 1,977 0 4
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1981 54–19 74.0% #8 2,055 0 6
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1982 38–18 67.9% #14 1,908 0 6
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1983 43–19 69.4% #13 1,929 0 7
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1984 42–19 68.9% #8 1,989 0 9
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1985 19–12 61.3% #24 1,832 0 9
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1986 13–11 54.2% #53 1,798 0 9
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1987 24–13 64.9% #20 1,841 0 10
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1988 11–9 55.0% #138 1,718 0 10
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,695 0 10
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Eliot Teltscher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 15 7 22 68.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 8 12 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 19 9 28 67.9% 16 9 25 64.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 17 4 21 81.0% 27 10 37 73.0% — — — — 27 13 40 67.5%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 24 5 29 82.8% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 18 8 26 69.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1983 18 6 24 75.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 19 6 25 76.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 19 8 27 70.4%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1987 14 7 21 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 161 69 230 70.0% 118 66 184 64.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 107 66 173 61.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Eliot Teltscher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1504 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.46
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1536 117.0 — — — — +77 -37 -20 38.5% -0.71 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.84
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1753 143.7 — — — — +29 -172 — 56.6% +0.76 9–7 (56%) 2–8 (20%) — +2.68
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1851 154.6 — — — — +26 -72 — 57.4% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.43
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1980 1978 160.5 — — — — +24 -59 — 67.7% +1.30 15–11 (58%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.55
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1981 2056 165.2 — — — — +86 -119 — 69.6% +1.37 13–7 (65%) 7–6 (54%) — -3.60
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1982 1908 154.7 — — — — +84 +10 — 65.4% +1.01 6–9 (40%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.77
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1983 1929 154.5 — — — — +69 -39 -274 61.6% +0.98 14–2 (88%) 11–15 (42%) — -0.44
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1984 1990 156.3 — — — — +52 -164 — 64.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.79
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1985 1833 139.0 — — — — +91 -69 — 58.3% +0.33 7–6 (54%) 9–5 (64%) — +1.47
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1986 1799 140.4 — — — — +83 -20 — 50.8% +0.33 5–1 (83%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.98
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1987 1841 145.9 — — — — +79 -83 — 60.2% +0.86 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.10
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1988 1718 115.7 — — — — +65 — — 58.5% +0.54 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +2.12
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 1990 1696 107.4 — — — — +55 — — 37.5% -0.62 1–1 0–1 — -0.08
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 2094 157.9 — — — — +58 -67 -133 61.6% +0.88 102–71 (59%) 75–79 (49%) 99.5 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.