H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 0-1
Eliot Teltscher holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eliot Teltscher leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1987 Scottsdale fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1987* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Eliot Teltscher | 6-3 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Eliot Teltscher | #1,093 | #6 | 15 | 2,091 | 392 | 207 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Eliot Teltscher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #239 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #106 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 71–27 | 72.4% | #10 | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,909 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,928 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,987 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #24 | 1,830 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #53 | 1,797 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #138 | 1,703 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |