H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Franco Davin H2H: 0-1

Franco Davin holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Franco Davin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Franco Davin won the 1992 Charlotte round of 16 6-3 4-6 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Franco Davin
ARG Age 56 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Franco Davin #66 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) Jim Grabb #75 Match data May 8, 1992* R16 Charlotte ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Franco Davin #960 #30 774 1,856 153 152 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Franco Davin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–1 50.0% #508 1,510 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 8–7 53.3% #111 1,583 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 14–17 45.2% #166 1,637 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 9–14 39.1% #94 1,623 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 23–12 65.7% #73 1,768 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1990 33–20 62.3% #35 1,764 0 2
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1991 11–14 44.0% #112 1,712 0 2
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1992 21–16 56.8% #46 1,667 0 2
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1993 11–21 34.4% #103 1,539 0 2
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1994 18–20 47.4% #61 1,611 0 3
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1995 4–9 30.8% #248 1,550 0 3
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #310 1,542 0 3
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Franco Davin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 14 17 31 45.2% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 23 11 34 67.6% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 31 16 47 66.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — —
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 14 35 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1993 — — — — 11 21 32 34.4% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 18 19 37 48.6% — — — — — — — —
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 — — — — 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — —
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 2 7 9 22.2% 151 143 294 51.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Franco Davin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1511 103.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.08
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1584 121.1 — — — — — +34 — 57.1% +0.23 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — +1.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1638 133.1 — — — — — +26 — 45.7% -0.53 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1623 137.7 — — — — — +30 — 44.6% -0.23 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1769 139.3 — — — — — +58 — 65.4% +1.05 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) — +2.43
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1765 145.3 — — — — -219 +125 — 58.6% +0.64 11–8 (58%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.06
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1991 1713 136.5 -2.09 +0.10 0.917 48.3% — +68 — 50.8% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.19
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1992 1668 126.6 -3.94 +2.75 0.971 49.5% — +104 — 53.5% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.84
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1993 1540 128.7 -3.33 +2.10 0.968 49.2% — +38 — 41.0% -0.33 3–10 (23%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.07
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1994 1612 133.1 -1.43 +2.41 1.009 50.3% — +45 — 49.4% -0.04 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.39
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1995 1550 116.0 -2.62 +0.90 0.916 48.2% — +38 — 42.4% -0.60 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.41
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1996 1543 101.7 +0.18 +4.10 0.907 46.8% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.17
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1856 141.2 -2.70 +1.94 0.965 49.3% -219 +64 — 51.6% +0.11 47–68 (41%) 37–32 (54%) 93.2 +1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.