H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Grant Connell H2H: 1-1

Jim Grabb and Grant Connell are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1991 Chicago round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Grant Connell
CAN Age 60 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grant Connell #93 6-1 6-4 Jim Grabb #76 Match data Feb 28, 1991* R32 Chicago ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jim Grabb #38 6-4 6-4 Grant Connell #81 Match data Jul 20, 1990* R16 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Grant Connell #1,367 #67 517 1,755 67 97 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Grant Connell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #555 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% #570 1,491 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #123 1,472 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1988 10–17 37.0% #134 1,527 0 0
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1989 8–11 42.1% #94 1,592 0 0
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1990 19–21 47.5% #92 1,667 0 0
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1991 20–21 48.8% #79 1,666 0 0
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1992 8–16 33.3% #186 1,572 0 0
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #946 1,562 0 0
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1994 2–4 33.3% #318 1,600 0 0
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1995 0–3 0.0% #713 1,551 0 0
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Grant Connell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1990 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 51 70 121 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 11 17 35.3% 10 13 23 43.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 65/75 of Grant Connell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Grant Connell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 36/41 5.4 3.0 58.5% 71.4% 51.2% 65.0% 37.8% 63.0% 36.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 20/24 5.4 3.4 58.7% 71.8% 50.4% 63.2% 24.3% 63.0% 33.5%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1993 1/1 7.0 5.0 53.6% 68.9% 43.6% 60.0% 50.0% 57.1% 37.9%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 1994 6/6 6.2 1.8 63.5% 74.1% 41.9% 66.1% 9.5% 62.7% 33.5%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% 1995 2/3 2.0 4.5 52.6% 62.7% 43.3% 50.0% 66.7% 53.7% 31.9%
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 65/164 5.4 3.1 58.8% 71.4% 49.7% 64.0% 32.1% 62.6% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Grant Connell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1497 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1491 104.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1987 1472 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.10
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1988 1527 117.0 — — — — +11 — — 41.3% -0.34 5–10 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.47
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1989 1593 135.1 — — — — +24 — — 47.1% -0.06 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.27
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1990 1667 139.1 — — — — +42 — -147 47.4% -0.08 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.46
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1991 1667 133.7 +1.73 -1.76 0.990 50.0% +16 — -109 48.6% -0.20 9–7 (56%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.90
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1992 1573 125.0 +0.70 -2.70 0.904 48.7% +25 — — 37.3% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.07
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1993 1562 103.6 +1.33 -0.62 0.884 48.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1994 1601 111.5 +0.44 -0.56 0.898 48.1% -53 — -5 37.5% -0.87 — 1–1 — -0.45
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1995 1552 98.7 -1.23 -0.51 0.689 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.29
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1756 134.7 +1.20 -1.88 0.942 49.2% +23 — -91 43.1% -0.36 25–37 (40%) 30–46 (39%) 92.5 -1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.