H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Jay Berger H2H: 3-1

Jim Grabb holds a 3–1 lead over Jay Berger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1989 Washington Open round of 16 7-6 6-3.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #135 7-6 6-3 Jay Berger #22 Match data Jul 28, 1989* R16 Washington Open ATP 250 Hard
Jay Berger #31 6-0 6-4 Jim Grabb #157 Match data Mar 9, 1989* R32 Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard
Jim Grabb #67 7-6 6-1 Jay Berger #32 Match data Oct 6, 1988* R32 Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard
Jim Grabb #62 6-4 3-6 6-1 Jay Berger #44 Match data Feb 18, 1988* R32 Memphis ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jay Berger #1,121 #7 1,271 1,947 141 80 63.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Jay Berger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1985 3–2 60.0% #250 1,571 0 0
19 1986 7–3 70.0% #82 1,665 0 1
20 1987 28–19 59.6% #47 1,768 0 1
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1988 28–16 63.6% #34 1,785 0 2
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1989 41–19 68.3% #10 1,841 0 3
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1990 32–18 64.0% #18 1,845 0 3
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1991 2–3 40.0% #387 1,801 0 3
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Jay Berger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1985 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 6 1 7 85.7%
20 1987 13 9 22 59.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 23 12 35 65.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1990 19 7 26 73.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% 81 42 123 65.9% 50 28 78 64.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Jay Berger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1985 1572 112.9 +57 57.9% -0.10 1–1 3–1 (75%) +0.70
19 1986 1665 116.1 -50 -34 61.5% -0.04 3–1 (75%) +0.72
20 1987 1768 146.6 -24 -22 59.7% +0.65 7–6 (54%) 6–7 (46%) -0.38
21 1985 1560 123.7 +46 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 +0.16 1988 1785 145.3 +58 -65 63.1% +1.00 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) -0.25
22 1986 1636 129.6 +34 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) +0.05 1989 1842 151.4 -18 +50 64.2% +1.07 10–6 (63%) 4–7 (36%) +0.56
23 1987 1688 137.5 +49 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) +1.31 1990 1845 149.4 +64 -35 56.8% +0.30 13–6 (68%) 10–4 (71%) +2.67
24 1988 1562 123.6 +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) -0.31 1991 1801 113.3 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +47 46.2% +0.16 +0.13
25 1989 1768 139.4 +19 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) -1.18
26 1990 1689 132.1 +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) -0.10
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) +0.72
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) +1.42
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) +0.36
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) +0.09
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) -1.25
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) +0.17
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.17
Career 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 1948 150.8 -1.34 +0.15 0.979 50.1% +20 -16 60.6% +0.68 39–26 (60%) 26–25 (51%) 102.1 +1.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.