H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-0

Jim Grabb holds a 3–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1995 San Jose third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 1995* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #69 7-5 6-4 Jeff Tarango #82 Match data
Apr 10, 1991* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R64 Hard Jim Grabb #65 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) Jeff Tarango #114 Match data
Aug 11, 1989* Livingston ATP 250 R16 Hard Jim Grabb #65 6-4 6-3 Jeff Tarango #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2