H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Jim Pugh H2H: 2-3
Jim Pugh holds a 3–2 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jim Pugh leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1989 Stratton Mountain semifinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1989* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jim Pugh | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| May 12, 1988* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jim Pugh | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1988* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jim Pugh | 6-3 2-6 8-6 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1987* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-0 5-7 6-4 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1986* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 6-1 6-4 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |