H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jim Grabb vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-0

Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Sydney Indoor second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 1992* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 R64 Hard Jim Grabb #78 6-4 6-4 John Fitzgerald #163 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6