H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Karsten Braasch H2H: 1-2
Karsten Braasch holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Karsten Braasch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karsten Braasch won the 1994 Rosmalen fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1994* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Karsten Braasch | 7-5 7-5 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1992* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Karsten Braasch | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1989* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 7-5 6-3 | Karsten Braasch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karsten Braasch | #1,445 | #38 | 878 | 1,731 | 68 | 93 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Karsten Braasch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #56 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #167 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #271 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #261 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #437 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |