H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Kelly Evernden H2H: 0-2
Kelly Evernden holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kelly Evernden won the 1988 Detroit third round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1988* | Detroit | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kelly Evernden | 6-1 7-6 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1987* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kelly Evernden | 6-4 7-6 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Kelly Evernden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |