H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-0

Jim Grabb holds a 2–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1995 Miami Open round of 128 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Luiz Mattar
BRA Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #70 6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(5) Luiz Mattar #112 Match data Mar 14, 1995* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jim Grabb #53 6-3 6-3 Luiz Mattar #45 Match data Feb 18, 1993* R32 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Luiz Mattar #888 #29 796 1,766 176 163 51.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Luiz Mattar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1986 6–7 46.2% #95 1,567 0 0
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1987 24–17 58.5% #38 1,696 0 1
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1988 19–17 52.8% #44 1,678 0 2
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1989 23–15 60.5% #62 1,681 0 4
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1990 25–18 58.1% #43 1,696 0 5
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1991 17–24 41.5% #113 1,632 0 5
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1992 21–17 55.3% #51 1,713 0 6
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1993 19–22 46.3% #70 1,691 0 6
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 1994 20–18 52.6% #73 1,697 0 7
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 1995 2–8 20.0% #404 1,594 0 7
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Luiz Mattar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1987 16 5 21 76.2% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 8 8 16 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 7 1 8 87.5%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 8 5 13 61.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1991 12 13 25 48.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 83 69 152 54.6% 71 76 147 48.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 12 33 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 143/168 of Luiz Mattar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Luiz Mattar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1991 36/41 5.0 2.1 58.4% 66.6% 49.4% 53.2% 43.5% 59.5% 37.0%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 1992 34/38 6.4 2.0 56.2% 71.6% 53.0% 64.9% 45.9% 63.5% 37.5%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% 1993 35/41 5.8 2.5 55.1% 69.5% 50.3% 59.1% 40.1% 60.7% 35.3%
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% 1994 28/38 4.5 1.8 59.1% 67.2% 50.6% 55.4% 35.7% 60.5% 36.2%
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% 1995 10/10 2.9 1.3 61.4% 61.9% 57.0% 69.4% 53.6% 60.1% 28.4%
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 143/339 5.3 2.1 57.4% 68.3% 51.2% 59.0% 42.4% 61.0% 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Luiz Mattar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1986 1567 121.0 — — — — -54 +30 — 50.0% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.15
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1987 1697 124.2 — — — — -13 -71 — 52.8% -0.01 12–5 (71%) 9–8 (53%) — +3.23
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1988 1679 135.5 — — — — -65 +52 — 52.9% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.58
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1989 1682 126.0 — — — — +17 -25 — 57.4% +0.47 6–7 (46%) 6–12 (33%) — +3.17
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1990 1697 127.6 — — — — +63 -53 — 54.5% +0.21 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +2.59
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1991 1633 123.3 -1.11 -1.85 0.913 48.4% +52 -31 -104 43.6% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.26
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1992 1714 131.8 +1.84 -1.25 1.026 50.5% -3 -41 — 51.5% -0.02 10–6 (63%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.94
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1993 1691 135.1 -0.37 -1.77 0.899 48.5% +48 -70 — 47.1% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.03
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 1994 1698 127.3 -0.05 -2.01 0.916 48.3% +15 -47 — 49.4% -0.17 8–1 (89%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 1995 1594 111.7 -2.46 -4.96 0.713 45.6% +20 — — 22.7% -1.64 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.33
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1766 133.5 -0.11 -1.94 0.921 48.7% +20 -30 -104 50.4% -0.07 62–47 (57%) 62–60 (51%) 104.7 +2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.