H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Mark Petchey H2H: 3-0
Jim Grabb holds a 3–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1995 Los Angeles third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1995* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-2 6-4 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1995* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1993* | Osaka | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-2 7-6(6) | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |