H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 3-2

Jim Grabb holds a 3–2 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jim Grabb leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1995 Paris Masters second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 1, 1995* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Mark Woodforde #49 6-1 6-3 Jim Grabb #166 Match data
May 12, 1994* Coral Springs ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Woodforde #60 6-2 6-3 Jim Grabb #132 Match data
Nov 8, 1991* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jim Grabb #97 7-6(3) 6-2 Mark Woodforde #112 Match data
Jul 19, 1990* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #38 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #126 Match data
Feb 17, 1988* Memphis ATP 250 R64 Hard Jim Grabb #62 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4