H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-2

Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1996 Seoul round of 16 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 6-3 6-0 Jim Grabb #255 Match data Apr 26, 1996* R16 Seoul World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-2 4-6 6-3 Jim Grabb #97 Match data Jul 19, 1995* R64 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Grabb #112 6-4 6-2 Martin Damm Sr Match data Aug 11, 1994* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jim Grabb Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —
1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 — — — — — — —
1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —
1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jim Grabb Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jim Grabb Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.05 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 107.9 +1.31 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -0.31 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) 100.2 -1.18 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 98.1 -0.10 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) 91.2 +0.72 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) 105.6 +1.42 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 97.3 +0.36 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) 98.4 +0.09 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -1.25 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 98.0 +0.17 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.