H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Marty Davis H2H: 1-1
Jim Grabb and Marty Davis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marty Davis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1988 San Francisco third round 3-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1988* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 3-6 7-6 7-6 | Marty Davis | Match data |
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marty Davis | 6-4 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Marty Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |