H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-0

Jim Grabb holds a 2–0 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1994 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 10, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jim Grabb #112 6-4 6-4 Mats Wilander #137 Match data
Nov 5, 1987* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Grabb #88 7-5 6-4 Mats Wilander #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 — — — — — — — 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 — — — — — — — 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,687 0 1 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,679 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,747 0 2 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,669 0 2 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,544 0 2 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,565 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —